The committee moved LD 2056 forward in a work session after members and stakeholders negotiated changes to clarify an exception for certain consumer financing options.
The amendment limits the narrow exception to new automobiles by defining them as "not previously titled vehicle(s)," rather than a broader "motor vehicle" term, and reduces the allowed payment-spread cap in paragraph C from 50% to 36% to constrain late-stage payment spikes. Linda Conti (staff) and proponents explained the change reflects compromise language negotiated with the Bureau of Consumer Credit Protection and lenders.
Representative Foley moved the motion 'ought to pass as amended' and Representative Olsen seconded. The committee voted 9–1 in favor; Representative Clucci voted 'ought not to pass,' citing risks of increasing consumer indebtedness and underwater trade-ins.
Members discussed concerns about whether the 'new automobile' definition was clear enough for dealer/credit practices and whether regional competition could produce cross-border use of financing products. The committee instructed staff to include the 'not previously titled' language to prevent the exception from sweeping other vehicle categories.