The House Judiciary Committee on Thursday advanced HB347, a bill aimed at closing what sponsors called an immunity loophole for platforms and developers that facilitate nonconsensual, AI-generated intimate images.
Representative Harrison, the bill’s sponsor, told the committee HB347 addresses “the proliferation of the AI notification programs and its inclusion on platforms” and seeks to limit protections for companies that go beyond being passive tools. “This bill adds an explicit statutory rule. A developer or provider fitting the carve out is deemed responsible for the creation or facilitation of the illicit material,” Harrison said.
An amendment inserted language changing a culpability standard and adding procedures for victims to request prompt removal of nonconsensual material. The amendment replaces the term “reckless” with “unreasonably” in key sections to define when a provider’s conduct is actionable and outlines processes for takedown requests and limited Internet service provider immunities for routine hosting.
Committee members asked whether the new standard would be easier to prove than ‘reckless’ conduct and discussed the scope of takedown procedures. Supporters said the change would make the rule clearer for courts and civil claims; questions focused on definitions and enforcement mechanisms. After debate, the committee adopted the amendment and gave HB347 a favor report.
The committee’s action was procedural only; HB347 will move forward to the next stage of the legislative process.