A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Board hears Evans Park master-plan pitch; committee seeks $150,000–$200,000 for landscape architect and $1.4 million option with schools

February 10, 2026 | Halifax County, Virginia


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Board hears Evans Park master-plan pitch; committee seeks $150,000–$200,000 for landscape architect and $1.4 million option with schools
County planning and parks committee members presented a multi-part plan to update Evans Park and provide short-term recreational options while a master plan is developed.

Presenters told the board that Evans Park has deferred maintenance and safety problems with amenities including a track the Virginia High School League has condemned, playground equipment needing replacement, damaged pavilions and a dock in need of repair. The committee recommended hiring a landscape architecture firm to lead site analysis, community engagement and concept design, producing a master plan and cost estimates to guide staged investments.

Presenters said the board had $75,000 in the budget for planning but that interviews with firms indicated a realistic budget for the master-plan work would be roughly $150,000–$200,000. They recommended interviewing five firms and deciding whether interviews should be public or conducted in closed session.

As an interim option, presenters discussed a memorandum of understanding (MOU) with Halifax County Public Schools under which the county would repair the high school's track and tennis courts and open them for community use. An initial MOU cost "about $1,400,000" was referenced as an upper-end estimate; presenters suggested a smaller stop-gap package focused on the track and courts — about $800,000 in combined estimates based on contractor quotes for the track and preliminary numbers for courts.

The committee asked the board for a consensus to proceed with the plan, direction on the MOU and permission to interview and recommend two top landscape architecture firms. Board members emphasized getting water and sewer issues resolved on larger projects first and suggested consolidating recreation and planning committees for community input. Ending: The board did not vote to commit the larger funds during the meeting; presenters were asked to return with firm recommendations and clearer budget proposals.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee