A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Cookeville council approves first reading allowing subdivision of commercial units, members press for shared-parking protections

February 09, 2026 | Cookeville City, Putnam County, Tennessee


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Cookeville council approves first reading allowing subdivision of commercial units, members press for shared-parking protections
Cookeville City Council voted 5-0 on first reading Jan. 15 to amend the city’s zoning code so certain commercial developments may be subdivided into individually owned lots, a change planners said would allow individual ownership within commercial centers while preserving parking and maintenance controls.

Planning Division staff member Mister Ward told the council the amendment would permit subdivision in CL (local commercial) and CG (general commercial) districts for newly built commercial developments that meet zoning and building-code requirements and that receive a certificate of occupancy after Jan. 1, 2026. "These modifications would restrict commercial subdivisions on individual lots to newly built commercial developments designed and constructed to meet the zoning and building code requirements and receiving a certificate of occupancy after 01/01/2026," Ward said.

Ward said the ordinance also requires a commercial owners association (COA) agreement to remain in place after final plat recording, and that shared-parking arrangements and parking easements must be shown on the final plat when shared parking is used. Council discussion centered on how parking would be handled if individual units own parcels without guaranteed access to shared spaces. An unidentified council member (S7) argued that "shared parking is a necessity in order to maximize the space," warning that without shared agreements "you're gonna park on the street" and that individual ownership could leave other lots overparked.

Planning staff responded that the proposed amendment already includes provisions to address shared parking and that parking requirements continue to be set based on use during the planning review process. Ward explained the city applies formulaic parking standards — for example, one space per 250 square feet for certain uses — and that uses such as restaurants are calculated by occupancy. He said applicable covenants and easements would be required at final platting to govern shared parking where used.

The council opened the public hearing on the ordinance and heard no speakers. Vice Mayor Eldridge moved to advance the ordinance on first reading; the motion was seconded by Councilman Gilbert and carried on a 5-0 vote.

Why it matters: allowing subdivision of commercial units could create more opportunities for individual ownership of retail and office spaces, changing how commercial centers are managed and maintained. The COA and parking-easement requirements are intended to protect shared infrastructure and public access.

The council approved the amendment on first reading after the public hearing and will follow the city's ordinance process for subsequent consideration.

Don't Miss a Word: See the Full Meeting!

Go beyond summaries. Unlock every video, transcript, and key insight with a Founder Membership.

Get instant access to full meeting videos
Search and clip any phrase from complete transcripts
Receive AI-powered summaries & custom alerts
Enjoy lifetime, unrestricted access to government data
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee