A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Rep. Roger Williams on immigration enforcement and shutdown risk: 'I don't think we're gonna shut down'

February 10, 2026 | Small Business: House Committee, Standing Committees - House & Senate, Congressional Hearings Compilation, Legislative, Federal


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Rep. Roger Williams on immigration enforcement and shutdown risk: 'I don't think we're gonna shut down'
Host Mark asked Rep. Roger Williams, 25th District congressman, whether the country faced another government shutdown amid controversy over ICE and immigration enforcement.

"I don't think we're gonna shut down," Williams said, adding that a recent bill had put roughly "$70,000,000,000" into relevant funding and that he saw little appetite for a shutdown over protecting the homeland. He framed refusal to fund as a political problem for those opposed to enforcement.

On incidents in Minnesota and public reaction, Williams urged cooling rhetoric and emphasized enforcement priorities. "If you're bad, if you break the law and you're a bad guy, you gotta go," he said, arguing federal and local law enforcement should cooperate to remove individuals who break laws.

Williams contrasted Minnesota with Texas, telling the host that Texas has been actively returning and deporting migrants without the same public unrest. He criticized sanctuary cities as undermining ICE operations, saying they are "illegal to begin with" and make coordination more difficult.

Why it matters: Statements from a sitting congressman about shutdown risk and enforcement reflect the policy priorities and political framing of border and immigration debates. Williams' remarks emphasize enforcement and intergovernmental cooperation; the interview did not include countervailing views or independent verification of enforcement claims.

What was not resolved: The interview presents Williams' assessment and policy preferences but does not produce specific legislative changes or decisions during the segment. Claims about the legality of sanctuary cities and the $70 billion figure were stated by Williams and were not independently verified in the interview.

The segment moved next to election strategy and small-business topics.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee