Campus free‑speech bill gets extended review after heated testimony from students and universities

Delegate Schmidt presented a substitute to HB 14‑73 that would clarify permissible limits on campus demonstrations, limit prior restraint on spontaneous student expression and add a reporting mechanism. The bill would not remove universities’ ability to address unlawful conduct or to impose reasonable time, place and manner rules, the sponsor said.

Student speakers and rights groups described confrontations at recent campus demonstrations and urged the panel to act. Serene Haddad, a Palestinian student, said she faced tear gas and disciplinary consequences after a VCU picnic protest and that her diploma was temporarily withheld; she urged the committee to "vote yes on House Bill 14‑73." Nancy Wien of the Virginia Coalition for Human Rights urged the committee to uphold students’ First Amendment rights.

University officials, including VCU’s chief of police and representatives from James Madison University, Old Dominion University and George Mason University, opposed the bill as written, arguing it removes tools such as prior registration that institutions use to plan for safety and to coordinate resources. Virginia Tech’s chief of police said removing registration would hinder preparation for pedestrian safety, access to buildings and responses to counter‑protesters.

Given the range of unresolved concerns and ongoing stakeholder negotiations, Delegate Lavere Bowling moved to continue HB 14‑73 to the 2027 session. The motion carried; the committee thanked the sponsor for his work and asked him to continue refining the language.

Because the bill was continued, no statutory change was adopted today; sponsors said they will engage further with university and safety officials to reconcile safety procedures and free‑speech protections.