Newcastle council votes 6–1 to endorse renewal levies for Issaquah and Bellevue school districts
February 07, 2026 | City Council Meetings, Newcastle, King County, Washington
This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »
Newcastle — The Newcastle City Council voted 6–1 to adopt Resolution 2026-1081, a nonbinding measure expressing the city’s support for renewal levies in the Issaquah and Bellevue School Districts.
Deputy Mayor Charbonneau moved to adopt the resolution and Council member Burford seconded. Charbonneau told the council the action was not a vote to raise taxes but a statement of support, and urged residents who live in affected districts to vote by Feb. 10. “This is not new taxes. It’s renewing existing levies,” Charbonneau said.
Council members who spoke in favor cited concerns about school funding and student mental health. Council member Jacobs said information from a recent town hall showed high counselor-to-student ratios; “the current status in our schools, especially the high schools, is 1 counselor per 4 to 600 students,” Jacobs said, citing the town-hall material, and contrasted that with a recommended ratio of 1 per 250.
Opposition centered on process and notice. Council member Griffin said many residents did not understand the meeting’s purpose and questioned whether the city should be weighing in on other districts’ levies. “I don’t believe the city business” includes some of the topics brought before the council, Griffin said. Griffin cast the lone dissenting vote.
Deputy Mayor Charbonneau responded to concerns about conflict of interest and noticing, saying the item had been discussed at two prior council meetings and that a staff omission of proposition numbers prompted the special meeting to clarify the record. “I think we’ve been transparent,” Charbonneau said.
Mayor Sherlock and other council members emphasized that levy renewals apply only to residents within each school district’s taxing boundaries. Council member Burford said the council’s statement is intended to show solidarity with schools and families, not to enact taxation. “We support our schools and our children,” Burford said.
After public comment and a short debate, the council took a recorded voice vote. The mayor announced, “Motion carries 6 to 1 with Council member Griffin in opposition.”
The resolution is advisory: it expresses council support but does not change tax law. The meeting adjourned at 5:53 p.m.
Deputy Mayor Charbonneau moved to adopt the resolution and Council member Burford seconded. Charbonneau told the council the action was not a vote to raise taxes but a statement of support, and urged residents who live in affected districts to vote by Feb. 10. “This is not new taxes. It’s renewing existing levies,” Charbonneau said.
Council members who spoke in favor cited concerns about school funding and student mental health. Council member Jacobs said information from a recent town hall showed high counselor-to-student ratios; “the current status in our schools, especially the high schools, is 1 counselor per 4 to 600 students,” Jacobs said, citing the town-hall material, and contrasted that with a recommended ratio of 1 per 250.
Opposition centered on process and notice. Council member Griffin said many residents did not understand the meeting’s purpose and questioned whether the city should be weighing in on other districts’ levies. “I don’t believe the city business” includes some of the topics brought before the council, Griffin said. Griffin cast the lone dissenting vote.
Deputy Mayor Charbonneau responded to concerns about conflict of interest and noticing, saying the item had been discussed at two prior council meetings and that a staff omission of proposition numbers prompted the special meeting to clarify the record. “I think we’ve been transparent,” Charbonneau said.
Mayor Sherlock and other council members emphasized that levy renewals apply only to residents within each school district’s taxing boundaries. Council member Burford said the council’s statement is intended to show solidarity with schools and families, not to enact taxation. “We support our schools and our children,” Burford said.
After public comment and a short debate, the council took a recorded voice vote. The mayor announced, “Motion carries 6 to 1 with Council member Griffin in opposition.”
The resolution is advisory: it expresses council support but does not change tax law. The meeting adjourned at 5:53 p.m.
View the Full Meeting & All Its Details
This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.
✓
Watch full, unedited meeting videos
✓
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
✓
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
✓
Permanent access to expanding government content
30-day money-back guarantee
