Charlton planning board narrows master‑plan process, asks members to return with ranked top three

The Town of Charlton Planning Board spent a substantial portion of its Feb. 4 meeting reviewing master‑plan consultant proposals and refining an evaluation matrix, but did not select a consultant. Members discussed weighting for public engagement and implementation approach, and agreed to return to the next meeting with completed scoring sheets and a proposed top‑three shortlist for interviews.

Why it matters: A master plan sets long‑term planning priorities for zoning, economic development and public engagement. The board emphasized that implementation schedules, track records in similar towns and demonstrable public‑engagement strategies are as important as the final deliverable.

Key points: Board members compared proposals from several firms (transcript references included VHB, Barrett, Dobson/Dobson, Garrett and regional planning entities referenced as CMRPC/CNPRC variants). Members debated adding a scoring category for housing and economic development (suggested weighting around 10 percent), clarifying 'understanding of similar towns' versus state‑level experience, and requiring clear deliverables and schedules. The board agreed to use a common spreadsheet template, individually score proposals, and reconvene with a top‑three list and questions for finalists. No final contract decisions were made.