The House committee spent its morning examining the Department of Disabilities, Aging, and Independent Living’s (DAIL) proposed FY27 budget of $829,747,105, with members stressing how heavily the department depends on Global Commitment (the Medicaid financing vehicle) and other federal funds.
DAIL staff presented a fund-source breakdown showing 88.2% of the budget under Global Commitment, 6.5% federal funds, 4.7% general fund and under 1% special and interdepartmental funds. "When you lose a dollar of general fund in this program, you are often losing $3," Speaker 2 told the committee, underscoring how state decisions can cascade through federal matching dollars.
The department outlined major program totals: developmental disability services just under $368 million (about 44% of DAIL’s total, with roughly 97% of that line from Global Commitment), the adult services division at $403,614,407 (about 49% of DAIL, 93% Global Commitment), vocational rehabilitation (HireAbility) at just under $36 million (roughly 76% federal, 24% general fund), a blind and visually impaired line near $6 million and a licensing and protection line under $8 million. The commissioner’s office was shown at about $8.5 million and chiefly supported from general fund.
Staff walked members through technical changes between FY26 and FY27, including a $31,346,555 net increase departmentwide and several budget-to-actual reconciliations that adjust spending authority without creating new program money. For example, the adult services division shows a budget-to-actuals reconciliation of about $3.35 million; staff described that as aligning spending authority with federal receipts rather than new appropriation.
Committee members also pressed staff about staffing counts. After an initial back-and-forth, Speaker 4 corrected earlier testimony and said the change from last year to this year is an increase of eight limited-service positions tied to specific grants and programs (including positions related to Money Follows the Person and VR counseling). Staff emphasized these are largely limited-service hires and do not represent a large new ongoing baseline.
The committee closed by noting available program-level data in the packet (program descriptions, populations served and performance measures) and setting a timetable: budget teams will make recommendations to the full appropriations committee, and members aim to complete recommendations by February.
Next steps: budget teams will follow up with suggested community partners to testify and the committee will continue its deliberations at subsequent sessions.