A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Bill would let state superintendent declare targeted school emergencies to allow temporary virtual instruction; opponents warn of shifting power from elected to

January 19, 2026 | Education, Energy, and the Environment Committee, SENATE, SENATE, Committees, Legislative, Maryland


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Bill would let state superintendent declare targeted school emergencies to allow temporary virtual instruction; opponents warn of shifting power from elected to
Nick Greer, the parent member of the Maryland State Board of Education, presented SB218 on behalf of the Maryland State Department of Education, characterizing the bill as a targeted fix to enable timely responses to prolonged, site‑specific school disruptions such as environmental hazards or major building closures. Greer said the current law requires a gubernatorial state of emergency for a local education agency to transition to virtual learning for prolonged periods, and that requirement can delay needed action.

Greer cited a Washington County example where asbestos abatement forced a high school closure affecting more than 900 students and required ad hoc solutions including community learning hubs and university partnerships. The bill would authorize the State Superintendent to declare a prolonged emergency limited to schools or school systems impacted by extenuating circumstances.

Catherine Garrett of the Love Maryland PAC provided unfavorable testimony, arguing SB218 would improperly transfer authority to close schools from elected and accountable officials to an unelected superintendent. Garrett cited research on harms from COVID‑era prolonged school closures and urged an unfavorable report.

Committee members asked technical questions and noted the need to balance timely operational flexibility and democratic accountability. No committee vote was taken; senators suggested follow‑up and additional clarifications would be needed before advancing the bill.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee