A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Committee advances bill limiting county zoning over small modular reactors after split testimony

February 03, 2026 | 2026 Legislature Arizona, Arizona


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Committee advances bill limiting county zoning over small modular reactors after split testimony
House Bill 27-95 passed from committee on Feb. 2 with a due-pass recommendation after an extended hearing that split public testimony. The bill would prohibit county zoning ordinances from preventing or regulating the construction and operation of a small modular reactor (SMR) if the owner or operator has obtained a federal early site permit, completed federal public notice and comment, and received federal design certification.

Sponsor Representative Carbone told the committee the bill aligns state law with federal nuclear oversight, protects property rights and streamlines processes for advanced nuclear deployments. Supporters including the Libre Initiative, Americans for Prosperity, and Arizona Municipal Power Users argued SMRs have smaller footprints and passive safety systems, and that clarifying state-level siting authority would encourage investment and jobs, especially in rural Arizona.

Opponents included the County Supervisors Association, the League of Arizona Cities and Towns and Sierra Club witnesses, who warned HB 27-95 would curtail county land-use authority, reduce local public participation, and could create oversight gaps around municipal boundaries and emergency response. County supervisors urged preserving local planning and the public hearing process; the League asked to exclude county islands and municipal planning areas or provide coordination requirements.

After questions and exchanges about federal preemption boundaries and how SMRs differ from traditional reactors, the committee voted to return HB 27-95 with a due pass recommendation (chair reported a 6–4 vote). Members who supported the bill framed it as fostering competitiveness and long-term energy planning; opponents stressed local oversight and safety concerns.

What comes next: The bill proceeds to the House floor. Committee testimony included requests from local government groups for follow-up negotiations on exemptions for county islands and municipal planning areas.

Don't Miss a Word: See the Full Meeting!

Go beyond summaries. Unlock every video, transcript, and key insight with a Founder Membership.

Get instant access to full meeting videos
Search and clip any phrase from complete transcripts
Receive AI-powered summaries & custom alerts
Enjoy lifetime, unrestricted access to government data
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee