A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Lawmakers hear wide support for strengthening Nebraska's Business Innovation Act

February 02, 2026 | 2026 Legislature NE, Nebraska


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Lawmakers hear wide support for strengthening Nebraska's Business Innovation Act
Senator Jason Prokop introduced LB1044, describing the Business Innovation Act as a successful economic development tool that helps early-stage firms move to market. The bill would remove the requirement that the Department of Economic Development's plan be approved by the governor, mandate minimum annual funding for prototype and seed programs (at least $4 million, up to $6 million per program), and include legislative intent for $15 million in annual appropriations beginning in fiscal 2026–27.

Proponents from Invest Nebraska, TechNebraska, chambers, founders and investors described measurable returns from the BIA. Kristen Hassebrooke, an Invest Nebraska board member, cited company outcomes and said predictable funding helps attract private capital. Witnesses repeatedly referenced independent impact analyses (University of Nebraska-Lincoln Bureau of Business Research) and pointed to CompanyCam, which received an early prototype grant and later grew into a company valued at $2 billion, as a case study of program success.

Business groups and startup founders urged stable funding sources and debated the best pay-for mechanism. Senator Prokop said he preferred a dedicated funding source (a 'suit tax' in companion proposals was mentioned elsewhere) and noted that the bill's intent language does not guarantee appropriation but signals legislative priority. Committee members pressed for clarity on fiscal notes and how the proposed funding interacts with related budget and statutory proposals.

Multiple proponents testified to statewide geographic impact across agritech, bioscience, and software sectors, and to job creation and tax revenue return; no neutral or opponent witnesses were present at the hearing, though written opponent submissions were noted. The committee closed the LB1044 hearing and will consider the bill in future committee action.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee