Committee advances bill barring governmental ‘net‑0’ policies; opponents warn of broad, unclear language

Representative Jacques presented HB 1217 to prohibit governmental entities from adopting net‑zero greenhouse gas policies and to bar state funding to entities that adopt such policies. The bill also would prohibit governmental adoption of 100% electric‑vehicle purchasing programs and certain carbon offset taxes.

Multiple witnesses and members urged narrowing definitions and adding grandfathering. Isabella Montiellegre with Pol Latinx testified, opposing the bill and warning that a broad, imprecise definition of "net 0" could create litigation and undermine beneficial energy‑efficiency efforts: "The definition of net 0 is not specific enough ... it will create lawsuits," she said. Kim Ross of Rethink Energy Action Fund testified the bill could have a chilling effect on cost‑effective policies that both reduce emissions and save money, and warned localities might have to turn down federal grant funds under a blanket prohibition.

Members asked about interactions with private or federal grants and First Amendment implications for campus groups; the sponsor said the bill's objective is to avoid a patchwork of local policies that diverge from state energy policy (citing Florida statute 377.601) and suggested stakeholders may help narrow language. The committee voted and reported the bill favorably.