The board debated whether the county should close the courthouse to the public and under what circumstances employees should be required or paid if sent home during severe weather.
Speaker 2 opened the discussion by asking whether the county or individual employees should decide to stay home in inclement weather and noted concerns that ordering employees home might create legal exposure. "One time we sent the employees home. Somebody got in an accident and we actually got sued for sending them home," Speaker 2 said, citing a local bank's experience.
Several members, including Speaker 6 and Speaker 5, emphasized safety for staff and the public and favored closing to the public while allowing department heads discretion on whether employees remain on-site or go home. Speaker 5 proposed updating the policy so that when emergency management advises 'no travel' on secondary roads the courthouse would close to the public and each department head would determine whether staff should leave; personal or other leave would apply to pay-status questions.
The board moved, seconded and approved the update by voice vote. The motion carried with an instruction that the county attorney and staff refine notice wording and that department heads work on operational details. Speaker 3 noted personnel-policy updates are already on the 2026 revision radar and that handbook language could be adjusted.
What happens next: staff will draft updated policy language, county attorney will review notice wording, and department heads will be tasked with local operational decisions about employee departures and pay. The board did not adopt precise pay rules in this meeting; those details will be set in policy language under review.