Council members reviewed a funds summary that staff presented for fiscal years ahead and debated which objectives are actionable given statutory and resolution restrictions on specific funds.
A councilmember noted several line items (permit technology funds, parking fund) and asked whether those amounts are available for reallocation. City staff (Crystal) explained each fund carries statutory or resolution-based restrictions: impact fees and gas taxes are restricted by state statute, parking and permit-technology funds were created by council resolution and in some cases can be reallocated by council action; other funds are restricted by grantor agreements.
Council also discussed a possible near-term revenue pressure. One councilmember said, "We're going to lose $2,000,000 if the most likely property tax proposal becomes law," and urged prudence; others proposed using some surplus to retire construction loan debt to preserve borrowing capacity for emergencies. Council asked staff for a fund-by-fund breakdown and a clearer presentation of reserves and restrictions before making allocation decisions.
Next steps: staff will provide a detailed fund‑by‑fund accounting of the listed $17.5M (which funds are restricted and which are available), and council will schedule follow-up agenda items for prioritized objectives and actions to preserve fiscal resiliency.