A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Committee hears bill to exempt government acquisitions from open‑space 'additional tax'

January 22, 2026 | Legislative Sessions, Washington


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Committee hears bill to exempt government acquisitions from open‑space 'additional tax'
House Finance on Thursday heard House Bill 2,140, a narrowly framed measure that would exempt land sold or transferred to a governmental entity from the "additional tax" owners pay when property is removed from an open‑space current‑use classification.

Committee staff Christina King summarized the proposal for members, saying the bill "exempts land sold or transferred to a governmental entity from additional tax when the land is removed from an open space classification in certain circumstances." She noted the measure caps the combined acreage affected at 20 percent of the classified property and includes statutory housekeeping changes such as an exemption from the tax‑preference performance statement and JLARC review; the Department of Revenue expects a one‑time rulemaking cost of about $30,000 in fiscal year 2027, and the overall state revenue impact was described as minimal but indeterminate.

Prime sponsor Representative Lowe told the committee the bill responds to a practical problem encountered by assessors and landowners when local governments acquire small strips of frontage for roadwork or other public improvements. "If we're gonna take land from a farmer, we're gonna take that 10 foot swath for the length of their property," Lowe said, "then we shouldn't also do 4 years of back taxes too." He described the bill as a targeted fix, not a broad change to current‑use law.

Bryce Yaden of FutureWise testified in support of the bill's intent but said his organization is working with the sponsor on narrow language changes to ensure land conveyed to local government does not become incompatible with adjacent agricultural or open‑space uses. "We support the intent of the bill and think it's a great idea," Yaden said, while asking for clarifying amendments to preserve the underlying use.

The committee took no action Thursday; the hearing record was left open for follow‑up and staff indicated fiscal details published later by the Department of Revenue would be added to the record.

Don't Miss a Word: See the Full Meeting!

Go beyond summaries. Unlock every video, transcript, and key insight with a Founder Membership.

Get instant access to full meeting videos
Search and clip any phrase from complete transcripts
Receive AI-powered summaries & custom alerts
Enjoy lifetime, unrestricted access to government data
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee