The Mercer Island School District board on Tuesday adopted a revised open‑enrollment (choice transfer) policy and related addenda that limit nonresident admissions and add clearer rules about continued eligibility.
Under the approved recommendation, kindergarten through fifth grade will remain closed to nonresident applicants. The district will accept limited nonresident students at grades 6–8 and 9–12, with qualifications tied to classroom capacity and program availability; district staff specifically closed pathways, early childhood and age‑22 pathway programs to transfers. Staff explained that applications are reviewed for grades, attendance and discipline for the preceding two years and that families must attest that the student will enroll full‑time in person.
Registrars and operations staff emphasized a practical constraint: the district will deny requests that would require opening new sections or adding teachers because that would create an additional cost beyond the state apportionment. Jamie and Michelle (registrar staff) described conditional approvals used when scheduling is close and said prior‑year transfers and continuing students receive priority in tie‑breaking.
The board also adopted clear academic thresholds for continued eligibility. The addendum defines “poor academic performance” as a cumulative GPA below 2.0; students who become credit‑deficient may lose open‑enrollment eligibility and would need to complete credit recovery (online or summer school) and reapply. Staff clarified that choice‑transfer approvals are renewed annually (staff children are treated differently under state law).
The vote followed a public comment from resident parent‑advocate Megan Hammel, who urged the board to pause new nonresident enrollments at the high school until the district analyzes IEP withdrawal and retention data and publicly reports on special education outcomes and IDEA compliance concerns. The superintendent responded that the district would examine whether the right data are being collected and could present findings at a future study session.
The policy will be implemented through the registrar’s application process and capacity checks; staff indicated appeals are rare but can proceed through the statutory appeals process to OSPI and, ultimately, an administrative hearing if needed.