Subcommittee passes HB702 to 'pass by' after hearing support, asks for technical fixes
January 23, 2026 | 2026 Legislature VA, Virginia
This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »
The subcommittee heard hours of testimony on HB702, a bill to create a consistent statewide framework for local firearm giveback or buyback programs modeled on Fredericksburg’s effort.
Delegate Cole, the bill sponsor, explained the substitute requires local law enforcement agencies to adopt policies by Jan. 1, 2028, designating when and where people may voluntarily return firearms, subjecting surrendered firearms to forensic testing, keeping surrenderers’ identities confidential, retaining firearms as evidence if linked to crimes, and destroying firearms not implicated in crimes. "The bill requires each local law enforcement agency to develop policies and procedures to implement either a firearm giveback program or a firearm buyback program by 01/01/2028," Cole said.
Chuck Fry Jr., vice mayor of Fredericksburg, described his city’s program: "In our first gun give back, we collected 64 guns in 4 hours ... Year to date since 2014 we are now at 242 guns in the city of Fredericksburg." Advocates including Everytown, Moms Demand Action, Brady and the Virginia Center for Public Safety testified that the bill would expand proven local practices.
Opponents, including the Virginia Citizens Defense League and NRA witnesses, raised concerns about destroying firearms with historic or monetary value and suggested auctioning high-value guns to federally licensed dealers to ensure legal transfers and background checks. Witnesses also suggested serial-number checks to return stolen weapons to rightful owners and questioned how buyback programs would interact with wills and probate.
Committee members highlighted technical gaps — no definition of "destroyed," unclear periodicity for programs, and procedures for stolen serial-number checks — and moved to "pass by" the bill to allow sponsors and staff to draft amendments. The motion carried by voice vote; the committee asked for clarifying language on periodicity, disposal, and stolen-firearm procedures before returning the bill.
Next steps: The bill was passed by for the desk so sponsors can present amended language addressing definitions and implementation details.
Delegate Cole, the bill sponsor, explained the substitute requires local law enforcement agencies to adopt policies by Jan. 1, 2028, designating when and where people may voluntarily return firearms, subjecting surrendered firearms to forensic testing, keeping surrenderers’ identities confidential, retaining firearms as evidence if linked to crimes, and destroying firearms not implicated in crimes. "The bill requires each local law enforcement agency to develop policies and procedures to implement either a firearm giveback program or a firearm buyback program by 01/01/2028," Cole said.
Chuck Fry Jr., vice mayor of Fredericksburg, described his city’s program: "In our first gun give back, we collected 64 guns in 4 hours ... Year to date since 2014 we are now at 242 guns in the city of Fredericksburg." Advocates including Everytown, Moms Demand Action, Brady and the Virginia Center for Public Safety testified that the bill would expand proven local practices.
Opponents, including the Virginia Citizens Defense League and NRA witnesses, raised concerns about destroying firearms with historic or monetary value and suggested auctioning high-value guns to federally licensed dealers to ensure legal transfers and background checks. Witnesses also suggested serial-number checks to return stolen weapons to rightful owners and questioned how buyback programs would interact with wills and probate.
Committee members highlighted technical gaps — no definition of "destroyed," unclear periodicity for programs, and procedures for stolen serial-number checks — and moved to "pass by" the bill to allow sponsors and staff to draft amendments. The motion carried by voice vote; the committee asked for clarifying language on periodicity, disposal, and stolen-firearm procedures before returning the bill.
Next steps: The bill was passed by for the desk so sponsors can present amended language addressing definitions and implementation details.
View the Full Meeting & All Its Details
This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.
✓
Watch full, unedited meeting videos
✓
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
✓
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
✓
Permanent access to expanding government content
30-day money-back guarantee
