A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Board raises math performance, overcrowding and special‑education funding concerns after elementary reports

January 22, 2026 | Manhattan-Ogden USD 383, School Boards, Kansas


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Board raises math performance, overcrowding and special‑education funding concerns after elementary reports
After the district’s elementary site council reports, board members asked for clarification on assessment trends and resource pressures.

Board member Katie said the literacy gains were visible in the packet but asked why early elementary math scores appeared low; presenters said fall scores are used as baselines, summer learning loss is a factor and the district is adapting professional learning strategies used in literacy to support math instruction. Presenters noted that some buildings have highlighted progress in math fact fluency and that ongoing PLCs and coaching target those areas.

Board members also discussed school safety partnerships and staffing. Presenters described a School Resource Officer who has worked with assemblies, dismissal procedures and family engagement; the district said the Pottawatomie County Sheriff Department supports rotations across schools and that the officer is a community presence for some buildings.

Sheila (identified in the transcript without a last name) described overcrowding pressures at her building: while some class sizes are smaller than last year, fourth‑ and fifth‑grade classes remain high and special‑education caseloads (including speech and IRC rooms) are among the district’s largest. She said the district expects additional help next year but recruitment for special‑education positions is challenging.

Board member Lou tied those building pressures to broader funding concerns, saying that full funding of special education would relieve much of the strain; he referenced a transcribed figure ('freed up a $138,000,000') when describing the scale of the funding gap and said that full restoration of special‑education funding is unlikely but would materially reduce local budget pressure.

No formal board directives or votes on these issues were recorded in the portion of the meeting covered here. Board members asked staff to continue monitoring assessment results and building needs as budget work proceeds.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee