East Haven board approves 2026-27 budget and OKs occupational therapist contract
January 28, 2026 | East Haven School District, School Districts, Connecticut
This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »
The East Haven School District Board of Education voted to approve the superintendent's proposed 2026-27 budget and, in a separate vote, approved an occupational therapist contract.
"Make a motion that we accept the superintendent's 20 26 20 27 budget," said Speaker 5, and Speaker 3 seconded. After roll call the clerk announced, "So that is 7 yes and 2 absent." The transcript does not list a dollar amount for the proposed budget.
The board also approved the one-year occupational therapist contract that staff had reviewed earlier in the meeting. Speaker 6 moved to approve the contract and Speaker 7 seconded; a subsequent roll call again produced seven "yes" votes and two absences. The contract covers the remainder of the current school year; board materials and staff presentation noted the contract includes a prorated personal day (the hire will receive one personal day because they start about halfway through the year), accrual of 15 sick days for a full year (at 1.25 days per month), three bereavement days for immediate family members, jury-duty pay with required documentation, participation in the municipal employees retirement fund, a $50,000 life insurance policy and accidental death and dismemberment benefits. Health insurance was described as cost-shared at 20.5 percent and the new dental plan will have a 50 percent employee cost share. The position works 35 hours per week and is eligible to work extended school-year services for special education.
Board members asked about market comparability for occupational therapist pay. Speaker 6 remarked that the offer "seems kind of ... odd" because some postings elsewhere showed higher pay; Speaker 4 and others responded that the salary offer reflected the candidate's experience and that occupational therapy is a competitive field with a wide salary range depending on setting.
The votes were recorded by roll call. The seven members recorded as voting "yes" were: Miss Delongo; Miss Johnson; Miss Putney; Miss Santiago; Mr. Stacy; Mr. Ella; and Dr. DeLucia. Two members were recorded as absent during the votes: Miss De Palma and Mr. Hennessy.
No further procedural steps for the budget were stated during the meeting. The board noted the next meeting is scheduled for Feb. 10.
"Make a motion that we accept the superintendent's 20 26 20 27 budget," said Speaker 5, and Speaker 3 seconded. After roll call the clerk announced, "So that is 7 yes and 2 absent." The transcript does not list a dollar amount for the proposed budget.
The board also approved the one-year occupational therapist contract that staff had reviewed earlier in the meeting. Speaker 6 moved to approve the contract and Speaker 7 seconded; a subsequent roll call again produced seven "yes" votes and two absences. The contract covers the remainder of the current school year; board materials and staff presentation noted the contract includes a prorated personal day (the hire will receive one personal day because they start about halfway through the year), accrual of 15 sick days for a full year (at 1.25 days per month), three bereavement days for immediate family members, jury-duty pay with required documentation, participation in the municipal employees retirement fund, a $50,000 life insurance policy and accidental death and dismemberment benefits. Health insurance was described as cost-shared at 20.5 percent and the new dental plan will have a 50 percent employee cost share. The position works 35 hours per week and is eligible to work extended school-year services for special education.
Board members asked about market comparability for occupational therapist pay. Speaker 6 remarked that the offer "seems kind of ... odd" because some postings elsewhere showed higher pay; Speaker 4 and others responded that the salary offer reflected the candidate's experience and that occupational therapy is a competitive field with a wide salary range depending on setting.
The votes were recorded by roll call. The seven members recorded as voting "yes" were: Miss Delongo; Miss Johnson; Miss Putney; Miss Santiago; Mr. Stacy; Mr. Ella; and Dr. DeLucia. Two members were recorded as absent during the votes: Miss De Palma and Mr. Hennessy.
No further procedural steps for the budget were stated during the meeting. The board noted the next meeting is scheduled for Feb. 10.
Don't Miss a Word: See the Full Meeting!
Go beyond summaries. Unlock every video, transcript, and key insight with a Founder Membership.
✓
Get instant access to full meeting videos
✓
Search and clip any phrase from complete transcripts
✓
Receive AI-powered summaries & custom alerts
✓
Enjoy lifetime, unrestricted access to government data
30-day money-back guarantee
