A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Panel approves bill barring transplant denials solely for COVID-19 vaccine status after emotional testimony

January 28, 2026 | Appropriations, HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, Committees, Legislative, Georgia


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Panel approves bill barring transplant denials solely for COVID-19 vaccine status after emotional testimony
A committee voted to advance LC339780, an amendment to what sponsors described as Gracie’s Law, that would prohibit a covered entity from denying an organ transplant solely because a patient has not received a COVID-19 vaccination.

Representative Gullett, the bill’s presenter, told the committee the language targets only COVID-19 vaccination as a sole determining factor and is not a broad anti-vaccine measure. “Solely based is the key here,” she said, describing the intent to prevent a single criterion from overriding an otherwise acceptable transplant candidacy.

Committee members expressed divided views. One member warned that the politicization of COVID-19 vaccines and the memory of severe illness and deaths in the pandemic argued against enacting the protection. That member recounted personal losses from COVID-19 while urging caution about signaling that vaccination is unimportant.

Teresa Patel, testifying during public comment, said she was denied a kidney transplant evaluation in 2022 because she declined the COVID-19 vaccine. She told the committee that her evaluation was terminated despite recommendations from her primary care physician, a positive antibody test and a religious exemption letter. “My vaccination status was the only reason that I was denied,” Patel said.

After discussion and testimony, a member moved the bill and the committee held a show-of-hands vote: 11 in favor and 6 opposed. The chair announced the motion passed and the bill will advance from committee.

The bill’s supporters said it protects medical and religious freedom for transplant candidates; opponents said transplant allocation involves complex clinical judgments and warned against undermining standards that protect public health and organ availability.

Don't Miss a Word: See the Full Meeting!

Go beyond summaries. Unlock every video, transcript, and key insight with a Founder Membership.

Get instant access to full meeting videos
Search and clip any phrase from complete transcripts
Receive AI-powered summaries & custom alerts
Enjoy lifetime, unrestricted access to government data
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee