Senate committee approves measure to place portraits of Washington and Lincoln in schools after heated student testimony

Chair Burgess introduced SB 420 and described an amendment narrowing requirements from every classroom to one prominent portrait per school building, with language specifying that placement and any purchases are subject to state appropriation. Burgess said the portraits were intended to "spark" civic conversation among students.

The committee heard roughly a dozen public comments — many from high‑school students and teachers — who were sharply divided. Opponents, including student organizers and teachers with Sea Alliance, said mandating portraits is symbolic and risks government overreach into classroom decor. "A picture cannot communicate the deep importance of Washington remaining principled in his convictions," testified Cassandra Toussaint, adding that substantive civic education requires well‑resourced teachers and curricula.

Supporters — including some educators and civic groups — said a low‑cost, state‑funded portrait in a prominent place can trigger useful conversations about history, including its difficult aspects. Senator Osgood told the committee that placing Washington and Lincoln on campus walls could prompt necessary discussions about slavery and inclusion rather than erase uncomfortable history.

After debate on representation, funding and pedagogy, the committee adopted the amendment by voice vote and then reported SB 420 favorably on a roll call. Chair Burgess thanked the students and described the hearing as an example of the kind of civic engagement the bill aims to foster.

The committee’s action advances SB 420, but the amendment’s "subject to appropriation" language means local districts would not be required to incur costs without state funding. The bill will move on for additional committee consideration and potential appropriation.