A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Anchor Bay board narrows trustee field to four finalists after 15 interviews; appointment vote set for Jan. 28

January 23, 2026 | Anchor Bay School District, School Boards, Michigan


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Anchor Bay board narrows trustee field to four finalists after 15 interviews; appointment vote set for Jan. 28
The Anchor Bay School District Board of Education on [date not specified] interviewed 15 candidates for a vacant trustee seat and moved to narrow the field to four finalists for a Jan. 28 appointment vote.

Board members began the evening with routine items and a reminder that the meeting was "being recorded, but we are not live streaming," a procedural step intended to keep waiting candidates from seeing the questions in advance. The panel asked each candidate the same set of questions about residency and voter status, the role of a school-board member, how they would respond when a majority vote runs counter to their view, and how they weigh community concerns, student needs, parental rights and applicable law.

Candidates represented a cross-section of educators, longtime residents, community volunteers and professionals. Several emphasized community service and student-centered priorities: one candidate said, "I would like to just continue to be an impact on the community," while a student applicant said, "Because I love Anchor Bay a lot...I think I'd be a good candidate" who could bring a student perspective to the board.

Topics that recurred across interviews included school security and budgeting, district communication, the district bond and building consolidations, special-education supports, and the recently adopted high-school phone policy. During questioning a board member stated that the district spends "just over $1,000,000 a year on security," and candidates debated tradeoffs between safety, cost and comfort with armed security on campus. A candidate with counseling and special-education experience urged care in balancing parental rights and student protections, calling such situations "thorny and litigious."

After the interviews a board member moved to amend the agenda to allow the board to act on the vacancy and, following discussion, the board voted to narrow the field to four finalists. The board clerk announced the names of the candidates who will advance to the final consideration: Brian Romano, Brian Covert, Laren Wentworth and Tom Braun. The motion to narrow the pool was moved and seconded by board members and "Motion passes," the clerk recorded.

The board repeatedly noted that a final appointment is expected on Jan. 28 and that any selected appointee will be notified and may be sworn in if procedural requirements are met. Board members closed the meeting by thanking applicants and staff; several said they hoped the strong turnout of applicants would lead to contested races in upcoming elections.

The board took no other binding policy action tonight; the narrowed slate will return to the full board for a formal appointment vote at the January 28 meeting.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee