A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Jonesboro board approves 8-foot back-corner fence variance for resident

January 20, 2026 | Jonesboro, Craighead County, Arkansas


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Jonesboro board approves 8-foot back-corner fence variance for resident
At a local Jonesboro board meeting, members approved a variance allowing a resident to raise a backyard fence to a maximum of 8 feet at the rear corner to accommodate steep terrain, with the fence sloping or stepping down to the existing 6-foot height toward the front.

The applicant, William Perkins, told the board he sought the change for privacy and to screen his back deck from a neighbor’s driveway, describing survey markers at roughly 10 feet, 8 feet and 6 feet and saying one post out in the woods could be as high as 12 feet without a variance. "I just want to increase that fence height between me and my neighbor there," Perkins said during his presentation.

Board members examined photos and a survey and raised the town’s standard 6-foot ordinance as the baseline. Several members recommended a stair-step approach — lowering the fence in 2-foot increments as it follows the slope — rather than allowing a continuous 12-foot panel. One member offered a motion to grant a variance "to a maximum of 8 foot at the back corner, following the contour of the ground to match back up to the 6 foot existing at the front corner." Another board member seconded the motion, and the board proceeded to roll-call voting. Affirmative votes were recorded for Miles, Bailey and Apples; the board carried the motion.

The board’s rationale emphasized terrain rather than the applicant’s desired absolute height: members said the allowance recognized a steep fall in grade near a white pipe/benchmark and should not create an across-the-board 8-foot fence visible from the street. Perkins confirmed that the permitted 8-foot allowance would include the white-pipe location and said he would adjust his plans accordingly.

The action was a variance specific to the described property and profile; the board directed the applicant to submit final plans that reflect the agreed slope/step-down approach and the 8-foot maximum at the back corner. No further appeals or conditions were noted during the meeting.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee