A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Board refers Los Patos Way concept to modification hearing officer, asks for deeper rooftop planters and quieter materials palette

January 20, 2026 | Santa Barbara City, Santa Barbara County, California


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Board refers Los Patos Way concept to modification hearing officer, asks for deeper rooftop planters and quieter materials palette
At a concept review Jan. 20, applicants proposed demolishing an existing five‑unit building at 34 Los Patos Way and building a new two‑story five‑unit structure with private roof decks and seven covered parking spaces. Because the narrow flag lot constrains a contiguous 15x15 on‑grade common open area, the team requested modifications: (1) an outdoor living/open‑space modification to allow distributed private roof decks plus on‑grade green areas instead of the contiguous on‑grade pad; (2) an interior‑setback modification to allow covered parking to encroach at the northeast corner; and (3) a minor parking reduction because a van‑accessible parking space and access aisle consume feasible on‑site area.

The design team described roof‑deck planters and a proposed 30‑inch‑plus raised planter strategy to achieve deeper soil depths for rooftop planting, plus stucco, simulated wood composite panels, and bronze‑anodized metal details. A neighbor, Arlene Larson, asked whether construction would affect an adjacent retaining wall and expressed concerns about staging and impacts to parking during construction; applicants said the retaining wall will remain and standard conditions of approval (including construction staging and permitted public‑right‑of‑way use) would govern work.

Board members generally supported referring the requested modifications to the modification hearing officer but asked the applicant to provide clearer site sections showing neighboring outlines, recalculated on‑grade open‑space excluding setback areas, deeper planters and stronger plant masses on the roof, and options for a quieter palette that reads more compatible with local context. Motion to refer with those comments passed.

Don't Miss a Word: See the Full Meeting!

Go beyond summaries. Unlock every video, transcript, and key insight with a Founder Membership.

Get instant access to full meeting videos
Search and clip any phrase from complete transcripts
Receive AI-powered summaries & custom alerts
Enjoy lifetime, unrestricted access to government data
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee