Town Manager Mercury told the council that staff need clearer direction about when to pursue requests made by individual council members in work sessions, particularly when topics vary in the staff time required.
Mercury said staff want to avoid repeatedly spending hours on research for items that only one council member later abandons. He asked whether the council prefers staff to act on requests from a single member, or only when multiple members indicate interest.
Several council members suggested a practical threshold to balance responsiveness and staff workload. Councilmember Howard and others argued for a higher bar for items that demand many staff hours; Councilmember Dan and Chuck recommended a smaller threshold but not a single‑member standard. The council generally coalesced around three members as a reasonable signal that staff should proceed with substantive research while allowing staff to perform quick, low‑effort checks for one or two members.
Town Manager Mercury said he will continue to make note during meetings of who expresses interest and will advise whether a request is likely to be a ‘short lookup’ or a major staff effort. The council did not adopt a formal ordinance; the agreement is an operational guidance intended to preserve staff capacity while keeping member‑driven ideas visible for potential action.
Next step: staff will treat requests that will require significant research or staff time as candidates for follow‑up only when at least three council members indicate interest, and will summarize requests at the end of sessions so members can confirm or withdraw interest.