Board hears recurring debate over 'angel' statue; Flintstone Park suggested as compromise
January 17, 2026 | Oak Harbor, Island County, Washington
This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »
The Oak Harbor Parks & Recreation advisory board discussed a long-running local debate over a proposed 'angel' statue and possible locations for installation.
Board member Mikhail Finkel said the issue has occupied substantial public discussion and urged progress: "I would just like to see it get put up," he said, noting the project has consumed meeting time. Several members said Flintstone Park has emerged as a compromise location after community opposition to siting the piece in Woodjammer Park.
Members described divergent views: the arts commission and some advocates had pushed for Woodjammer Park, while other residents opposed placing the statue there. Board members characterized Flintstone Park as a reasonable compromise that would allow the installation without displacing existing park features.
No formal vote or final siting decision occurred during the meeting; board members said further coordination with the arts commission and city council will be required before moving ahead. The board will consider design, placement and any required council approvals in future meetings.
Board member Mikhail Finkel said the issue has occupied substantial public discussion and urged progress: "I would just like to see it get put up," he said, noting the project has consumed meeting time. Several members said Flintstone Park has emerged as a compromise location after community opposition to siting the piece in Woodjammer Park.
Members described divergent views: the arts commission and some advocates had pushed for Woodjammer Park, while other residents opposed placing the statue there. Board members characterized Flintstone Park as a reasonable compromise that would allow the installation without displacing existing park features.
No formal vote or final siting decision occurred during the meeting; board members said further coordination with the arts commission and city council will be required before moving ahead. The board will consider design, placement and any required council approvals in future meetings.
View the Full Meeting & All Its Details
This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.
✓
Watch full, unedited meeting videos
✓
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
✓
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
✓
Permanent access to expanding government content
30-day money-back guarantee
