A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

After heated public comment, Mohave County delays decision on 195‑foot Valvesta cell tower and will hire independent RF reviewer

January 19, 2026 | Mohave County, Arizona


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

After heated public comment, Mohave County delays decision on 195‑foot Valvesta cell tower and will hire independent RF reviewer
A contested special‑use permit for a 195‑foot wireless communications tower in the Valvesta area prompted a lengthy public hearing and a decision to delay any final action while the county secures outside technical review.

Residents living near the proposed site described the tower as a “monstrosity” that would mar scenic views and depress property values. Jill Martin, who lives adjacent to the parcel, told the board the proposal would “permanently scar” the front view of her home and argued there was no demonstrated gap in coverage at her location.

Opponents raised health concerns linked to long‑term radiofrequency exposure and cited studies and classifications by international bodies; speakers also complained about inconsistent or missing mailed notice of the hearings. Several neighbors said earlier votes had denied similar proposals and questioned why the item returned to the board.

Sun State Tower representatives and their retained RF engineer described technical reasons the site was selected, saying the parcel provides a necessary microwave backhaul path and enables a previously approved southeastern site to operate. “This site is going to be a donor site to allow for the communication link for the other site to be able to make it back to the switching center,” consultant Stephen Kennedy said. Applicant counsel said carriers must meet FCC and FAA rules and that the FAA has made a 'no hazard' determination for the site.

Several supervisors said the board depends on applicant‑provided technical analyses and lacks in‑house radio‑frequency expertise. The board voted to continue the item and directed county staff to solicit and procure an independent, on‑call RF site engineer to review the applicant’s coverage/backhaul claims and report findings to the board before taking final action.

The continuance means no permit is approved; the applicant and objectors will have another opportunity to present after the county completes the independent review.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee