A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Committee directs city attorney to tighten RSO transition wording to block utility surcharge increases

January 15, 2026 | Los Angeles City, Los Angeles County, California


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Committee directs city attorney to tighten RSO transition wording to block utility surcharge increases
The Housing and Homelessness Committee voted Jan. 14 to direct the city attorney to draft an ordinance amending subsection d of Los Angeles Municipal Code section 151.06’s transition provisions so that rent increases taking effect on or after the ordinance’s effective date cannot include an additional utility‑based increase.

Council member discussion and public comments centered on whether notices served before the ordinance’s effective date could still take effect after that date and therefore capture a utility ‘‘bump.’’ Christina Boyer, an attorney with Public Counsel, told the committee the existing wording could allow landlords to lock in utility increases for notices served before the change and urged the committee to close that loophole.

City Attorney representative Peter Wofford and a housing department representative (Anna) explained the ordinance’s effective date is Feb. 2 based on city clerk publication and that LAHD posted guidance reflecting that interpretation. Wofford said the proposed motion would shift the controlling date from when notice was served to when a rent increase takes effect, preventing landlords from relying on prior notices to capture an additional utility adjustment once the new formula is in force.

Fred Sutton of the California Apartment Association cautioned that changing the transition timing could create regulatory whiplash and potentially put housing providers who relied on the earlier posting out of compliance; housing staff said they had received many inquiries but had not identified intentional illegal increases to date and would update educational materials as needed.

Outcome: The committee approved the motion directing the city attorney to draft the ordinance language by recorded vote (4 ayes, 0 noes, 1 absence). The vote followed clarifying exchanges about how multi‑year leases and notices interact with RSO timing and about LAHD outreach to landlords and tenants.

Next steps: The committee’s vote sends the matter back to the city attorney for drafting. LAHD said it would revise website guidance to reflect any change approved by council and would continue outreach and workshops to explain allowable rent increases.

Don't Miss a Word: See the Full Meeting!

Go beyond summaries. Unlock every video, transcript, and key insight with a Founder Membership.

Get instant access to full meeting videos
Search and clip any phrase from complete transcripts
Receive AI-powered summaries & custom alerts
Enjoy lifetime, unrestricted access to government data
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee