A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

House committee narrowly backs resolution urging Congress to recognize Piscataqua River and Portsmouth Harbor as New Hampshire territory

January 16, 2026 | State-Federal Relations and Veterans Affairs, House of Representatives, Committees , Legislative, New Hampshire


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

House committee narrowly backs resolution urging Congress to recognize Piscataqua River and Portsmouth Harbor as New Hampshire territory
A sharply contested committee vote on Jan. 16 produced an 8–6 recommendation to advance HR 45, a resolution urging Congress to recognize the Piscataqua River and Portsmouth Harbor as New Hampshire territory.

Representative Barton, prime sponsor, framed the resolution around historical records in the state archives and the imagery on New Hampshire’s seal that depicts the frigate Raleigh. "We would not put another state on our flag and on our seal since 1784," Barton told the committee, and he urged use of archival documents showing New Hampshire’s historical claim to the islands and harbor.

Archivist Ashley Miller said the state archives gathered legislative records and primary sources documenting assertions of state jurisdiction and made them available to the committee. Longtime Portsmouth resident and former shipyard employee Sue Paladora testified that many Granite Staters working at the Portsmouth Naval Shipyard have paid Maine income taxes despite living in New Hampshire and that historical documents support a New Hampshire claim.

Supporters proposed a two‑track strategy: (1) a short‑term ask that the president issue an executive‑branch action (a directive on duty station/duty‑station reporting) to treat Naval Shipyard duty stations as New Hampshire for payroll and tax purposes, and (2) a request to Congress to consider statutory or boundary actions. Sponsor Barton described a draft transmittal letter and a proposed presidential executive order (to change duty station reporting for federal employees) to accompany the resolution.

Opponents urged caution. Some members referenced a 1977 agreement and a subsequent 2001 matter that complicated litigation prospects; they said Congress and courts have limited appetite to reopen settled boundary disputes and warned of the diplomatic and fiscal consequences. Representative Jones said the state's prior bipartisan effort to keep the shipyard open was an example of effective collaboration with Maine; he worried the resolution could undermine that cooperation.

Committee action: The panel voted 8–6 to recommend OTP and sent the resolution to the House calendar. The committee also discussed but did not approve putting the resolution on the consent calendar.

What’s next: The resolution will be transmitted to New Hampshire’s congressional delegation, the President and other federal actors as listed in the resolution. Supporters said they will also prepare evidentiary materials (legal memorandum and historical packet) to accompany the request.

Who spoke: Representative Barton; Ashley Miller (State Archivist); Sue Paladora (former shipyard employee/historian).

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee