A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Darien outlines PK–12 literacy plan, assessment audit and steering teams

January 15, 2026 | Darien School District, School Districts, Connecticut


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Darien outlines PK–12 literacy plan, assessment audit and steering teams
Darien School District literacy leaders told the curriculum committee they are pursuing a systematic PK–12 approach to literacy that builds on K–3 HMH program implementation and adds a unified vision, committee structure and an assessment audit to reduce duplication and strengthen instruction.

Dr. Falcone framed the update by saying the work extends beyond K–3 and must ensure a coherent continuum: "We really need to be thinking about a continuum," she told the committee. Kristen Collins described a three‑tiered team model — a district leadership team, a PK–12 literacy steering committee and a 3–6 core review team — that will guide curriculum alignment, pilot reviews and building‑level implementation.

Presenters said K–3 teachers have spent professional learning time on the HMH units and that the district will conduct an assessment audit to choose fewer, better assessments that inform teaching and progress monitoring. Collins said the leadership and core review teams have already met and that teachers across grade bands are collaborating to improve transitions and coherence.

Collins and Falcone listed staff and principals involved in the work, including Shirley Klein, Scott McCarthy, elementary principals Natasha Torrey and Paula Bleakley, and MMS principal Keita Mullis. They said the leadership team meets roughly six to seven times a year and the other committees meet four to five times. A near‑term deliverable is a draft framework for grades 4–5 expected by the end of the school year; the teams will then audit current practices and pilot potential next‑year program changes.

Board members asked for measurable outcomes and timelines; presenters responded that the current draft focuses on the "why" and that measurable program goals and targets will be the next step once the framework is finalized. Staff also described potential long‑term supports including instructional coaches to sustain coherent practice across grade bands.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee