A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

District attorney flags discovery burden, expungement workload and wins for grant funding

January 13, 2026 | Crook County, Oregon


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

District attorney flags discovery burden, expungement workload and wins for grant funding
The Crook County District Attorney told commissioners that statutory changes requiring earlier production of digital evidence and expanded automatic expungements have created significant new work and unreimbursed costs for the county.

"Evidence.com should significantly help that," the DA said, describing plans to move law-enforcement digital evidence into a platform that integrates redaction and unlimited storage to reduce manual processing time and unpredictable per‑gigabyte charges.

The DA explained the problem: after discovery-law changes, the office must gather and provide police reports, videos and other materials early in a case, which increases storage and redaction needs. Staff currently extract and redact material by hand and move closed-case files into separate storage to control costs.

The office is also seeing more expunctions mandated by state law. "When expungement is automatic, there is nothing in the legal system that's automatic," the DA said, noting significant manual steps — eligibility review, victim notice and coordinated deletion across law-enforcement systems — and that the legislature has not funded the added workload.

On staffing and funding, the DA said the office hired a DA investigator and a new deputy district attorney, and secured $50,000 in child-abuse grant funds over two fiscal years to support the investigator position ($25,000 per year). The office also identified $70,000 from justice-reinvestment grant funds and reported maximizing VOCA funding after an earlier funding uncertainty.

Commissioners questioned how discovery fees are billed and whether state-level funds reimburse county production costs. The DA said public defense entities receive state money for discovery but counties are not always reimbursed for the staff time and software expenses involved in producing the material.

No ordinance or formal board action was proposed in the presentation; the DA requested continued support as the office integrates new digital-evidence tools and manages expungement demands.

Don't Miss a Word: See the Full Meeting!

Go beyond summaries. Unlock every video, transcript, and key insight with a Founder Membership.

Get instant access to full meeting videos
Search and clip any phrase from complete transcripts
Receive AI-powered summaries & custom alerts
Enjoy lifetime, unrestricted access to government data
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee