Committee presses MOSH on plan that cuts on-site parking from 75 to 30; amendment on performance schedule carried, bill deferred

Committee members spent a long portion of the meeting questioning Museum of Science & History (MOSH) and Downtown Investment Authority (DIA) representatives about a proposed revision to the redevelopment agreement that would reduce on-site parking at the new museum site.

Philip Peterson (staff) explained an amendment clarifying that the DIA board — not the DIA CEO — would have authority to extend performance schedules by up to six months. That amendment carried without opposition.

Council members then focused on a separate design decision that would cut the number of on-site parking spaces from 75 (in the redevelopment agreement) to 30 and rely on nearby public parking decks and potential shuttles. MOSH and its consultants said 75 spaces would be insufficient for peak demand and that the new building would be larger than the old facility; MOSH representatives estimated typical parking demand "probably 200 to 400 spaces" on busy days and said abundant city-operated garages are within walking distance.

Emily Pierce, representing design/finance counsel, told the committee the underground garage that would have contained 75 spaces would cost "5 plus million dollars" and that changing to 30 at-side spaces produces a net savings of "at least $4,000,000," money proponents argued should be invested back into exhibits and the building. Several council members cautioned that off-site parking, possible charging for garage use, shuttle arrangements, employee parking plans and school-bus access must be firmly addressed. Council members sought a commitment that on-site spaces not be consumed by staff if patrons need them.

After extended questioning, the chair deferred the bill to allow MOSH, DIA and staff to provide formal design submissions, confirm parking and shuttle plans, and address concerns about accessibility, school visits and long-term stewardship of city funds.

What happens next: MOSH said conceptual designs reflecting the revised parking approach are expected to be submitted to the board by year end and then to city staff for review. The committee left the amendment on file and deferred final action on the redevelopment bill.