A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Commission opens review after letter shows high CIP change orders; commissioners question $93M bond sizing

January 10, 2026 | Redondo Beach City, Los Angeles County, California


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Commission opens review after letter shows high CIP change orders; commissioners question $93M bond sizing
The commission launched a review of capital improvement project (CIP) change orders after reading a letter from resident Jim Mueller outlining that 10 of 22 projects had significant change-order activity and that year-to-date change orders equaled about 19 percent of engineer's estimates for the sampled projects.

Commissioners said the pattern of change orders can indicate multiple causes: volatile materials and labor pricing, unforeseen site conditions, or deficient pre-bid scoping and design. The letter's author recommended deeper inquiry; commissioners agreed and asked that the CIP subcommittee assemble specific written questions for Public Works and for the public works director (or a high-ranking designee) to answer at a future meeting.

One commissioner also read an article excerpt alleging City Manager Mike Wazinski told a local news outlet that the $93,000,000 bond amount was chosen because "we just thought that was a good number." Commissioners said that quote, if accurate, raises transparency and planning concerns and should be clarified by city management. Staff responded that the city has engaged Griffin as an owner's representative to assist with planning, sequencing and procurement for the fire-and-police bond projects and that Griffin and the city's financial advisor are monitoring bond proceeds to stay within the approved amount.

Public commenters with contracting experience told the commission that truly unforeseen conditions are rare and that weak scope definition and fragmented oversight often produce predictable and repeat change orders. Commissioners debated whether to pause approving change orders, seek an outside consultant to audit projects, or tighten RFP and bidding language.

The commission voted to return the CIP questions and related materials to a future meeting after the subcommittee completes targeted questions and staff provides the public-works change-order process documentation and samples of competitive-bid packages to review.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee