A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

PUC upholds ALJ finding that RMNG compressor replacement does not require CPCN; staff exceptions denied

December 23, 2025 | Public Utilities Commission, Governor's Boards and Commissions, Organizations, Executive, Colorado


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

PUC upholds ALJ finding that RMNG compressor replacement does not require CPCN; staff exceptions denied
The Colorado Public Utilities Commission on Dec. 30 affirmed the administrative law judge’s finding that Rocky Mountain Natural Gas does not need a certificate of public convenience and necessity (CPCN) to replace two aging compressors at its Crystal River compressor station with a single equivalent unit.

Lindsay Dundas, commission counsel, summarized the petition and the ALJ’s recommended decision, which found the replacement to be an "ordinary course of business" activity under Colorado statute 40-5-101(1)(a)(3) and therefore not a CPCN-triggering project. The record showed the two compressors were installed in 1989 and 1990, posed maintenance challenges because of age and parts scarcity, and that the replacement would not expand system capacity or service territory.

Staff filed exceptions asking the commission to expressly affirm that equivalent compressor replacements fall within the ordinary-course exception only after an alternatives analysis (including electrification). Dundas recommended denying staff’s exceptions, saying that raising the policy issue here would amount to an impermissible rule change in a petition focused on a specific utility project. She said staff is free to open a future rulemaking to consider prospective rule changes.

Commissioners discussed the policy implications and several said staff’s concerns about alternatives and electrification were worth exploring in a formal gas rulemaking. The commission did not adopt staff’s exceptions and instead opted to table further policy action for a separate rulemaking process.

The commission’s action preserves the ALJ’s factual findings (limited to the project before the PUC) while acknowledging the broader policy questions could be addressed in a dedicated rulemaking docket.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee