Monte Vista updates council on Sky High EOC project; FEMA requirements and funding gap shrink scope

City staff told the Monte Vista City Council that the Sky High Emergency Operations Center (EOC) project — including a four‑stall shower building and a 14‑space RV area — is significantly over budget across the generator and EOC portions.

Staff reported an estimated funding shortfall of roughly $1,000,000 when combining the generator and EOC work. One cause cited was a change in federal procurement requirements after the original specifications: staff described an increase (about $168,000) to meet the federal 'Buy American' (transcript wording varied) standards for generator components and associated materials. Bids reflected those changed requirements and the low bid came in around $2.1 million for the portion discussed.

To respond, staff said they cut items from the scope to align with what FEMA advertised in the grant and retained the core functions required for eligibility. The revised scope retains a basic four‑stall shower building (each stall with an integrated restroom), 14 RV spaces with centralized water and a single sewer dump, and minimal site amenities. Staff indicated Alcon (contractor) has re-submitted pricing and met with staff to value‑engineer the work. They have requested a federal time extension for spending the grant funds (deadline cited as May 2026) and described that the city is awaiting action from state/federal contacts.

Council and staff noted timing and coordination issues: federal approvals, buy‑American compliance, and weather windows factor into the schedule; staff said a council award could appear on Dec. 18 and construction could start in March if weather allows. Staff emphasized continuing efforts to reduce cost while meeting grant rules.

Why it matters: The EOC and supporting facilities are intended to support emergency operations and provide temporary shelter and hygiene resources in disasters. Cost increases driven by federal compliance rules and competitive bidding may delay or reduce project scope unless additional funds or grant flexibility are obtained.

What remains unclear: Exact final contract amounts and the total revised budget were not specified in the transcript; staff said they are negotiating with the contractor and pursuing an extension with FEMA.

Next steps: Staff to continue value-engineering with the contractor, pursue a federal extension, and return to council with a recommended award and revised budget.