A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

BZA denies paving waiver for Jones property after resident warns of millings leaching into Old Hickory Lake

November 22, 2025 | Wilson County, Tennessee


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

BZA denies paving waiver for Jones property after resident warns of millings leaching into Old Hickory Lake
The Wilson County Board of Zoning Appeals voted to deny an applicant’s request to waive commercial paving requirements for a storage/parking area on a C‑3 zoned parcel (case 4349).

Planning staff told the board that commercial parking and drive aisles must be paved under the zoning order and recommended denial of Billy Jones’ request for a blanket waiver. Jones told the board the site functions primarily as a storage yard for trailers and related equipment and that roughly 4 acres are currently in use as storage.

During public comment, Reagan Fuquay Saar said she lives at 1225 Northern Road and described ongoing environmental concerns connected to asphalt millings that have been placed near the site and along a nearby drainage. Her testimony said the millings have crossed a drainage that flows to Spence Creek and Old Hickory Lake and that, in her view, “the milling is sitting down and all of the storm water drainage is picking up all the microplastics.” She testified the material contains bitumen and alleged it releases heavy metals; she said millings “are not allowed in landfills in the state of Tennessee” and warned of risks to swimmers and anglers in Old Hickory Lake.

Board members and staff focused the hearing on the limited question before them: whether to waive county paving standards for the areas used as parking and drive aisles. Staff reiterated that if the area is used as a parking lot under the ordinance, the paved parking and drive aisles would be required and a site plan would be needed. The board then voted to deny the waiver based on staff recommendation.

The board’s denial means the applicant must comply with the county’s paving and site‑plan requirements if the use is developed as a parking lot. Environmental and public‑health claims raised by a resident were recorded in the public record during the hearing but were not independently substantiated by staff testimony at the meeting; they may be referred to county environmental staff or state regulators for follow up.

Don't Miss a Word: See the Full Meeting!

Go beyond summaries. Unlock every video, transcript, and key insight with a Founder Membership.

Get instant access to full meeting videos
Search and clip any phrase from complete transcripts
Receive AI-powered summaries & custom alerts
Enjoy lifetime, unrestricted access to government data
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee