A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

County reviews options for '0.09' public infrastructure fund, considers competitive grants and set‑asides

December 18, 2025 | Franklin County, Washington


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

County reviews options for '0.09' public infrastructure fund, considers competitive grants and set‑asides
At a Dec. 17 workshop, consultant Eric Johnson reviewed the county ridal/0.09 public infrastructure fund (RCW 82.14.370) and offered options to revitalize the program. He said the fund historically brought in about $2.5 million to $2.8 million per year and that the county currently has an estimated balance of roughly $11.3 million.

Johnson summarized eligible uses under the statute — public facilities supporting economic development, affordable workforce housing infrastructure, and personnel in economic development offices — and described reporting and planning requirements that can trigger state auditor scrutiny if projects are not listed in required planning documents. "You need to consult with the cities, towns, port districts... to make sure expenditures are consistent with the RCW," Johnson said.

He outlined three common allocation approaches: a competitive grant program with an evaluation committee (the most common), formulaic entity allocations (used by a small number of counties), and hybrid models that reserve funds for emergent opportunities or debt service. Several commissioners said they favored a competitive grant program with a set‑aside for emergency needs; one suggested holding back funds for emergent opportunities so the county can act quickly.

City of Pasco officials, represented by City Manager Harold Stewart, told the board the city would welcome a partnership and said its capital improvement projects include work that could align with the county fund. Commissioners discussed possible local priorities such as congestion and safety improvements on Road 68/Taylor Flats and the need to update the county's economic development and capital facilities plans before allocating funds.

Next steps discussed included drafting a competitive‑grant program and evaluation criteria, defining any emergency set‑aside percentage or dollar amount, and continuing consultation with cities and ports before formal adoption.

Don't Miss a Word: See the Full Meeting!

Go beyond summaries. Unlock every video, transcript, and key insight with a Founder Membership.

Get instant access to full meeting videos
Search and clip any phrase from complete transcripts
Receive AI-powered summaries & custom alerts
Enjoy lifetime, unrestricted access to government data
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee