A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Council narrowly grants Green Bay resident's appeal to keep four dogs

December 17, 2025 | Green Bay, Brown County, Wisconsin


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Council narrowly grants Green Bay resident's appeal to keep four dogs
The Green Bay City Council voted 7 to 5 on Dec. 16 to grant an appeal from resident Raven Wallene that reverses a humane officer's denial of an excess-dog permit.

Wallene, who identified herself and the apartment unit where she lives, told the council she had taken in the animals after a family death and that she had followed the complex's emotional-support-animal rules. "I have followed every rule to the letter," Wallene said, asking alderpersons to consider the ages and bond of the animals before requiring rehoming.

Officer Mavis, a nationally certified humane officer with 18 years of city service, explained why she recommended denial: the Broadway Lofts and surrounding properties have had repeated animal-control complaints, including aggressive-dog incidents, loose animals and failure to secure management cooperation. She said prior management had approved a variance improperly and that the denials were rooted in the number of animals in a shared rental building rather than the behavior of Wallene's pets. "It has nothing to do with the animal's behavior... Unfortunately, it's just too many animals for the dwelling unit," the officer said.

Several neighbors and a supporter who spoke at the podium described how the dogs are cared for and urged the council to allow Wallene to keep them, citing their age and the hardship of rehoming senior animals. Alders debated whether the issue is primarily a landlord-management problem and whether the council should use discretion in individual cases. Alder Johnson, who moved to grant the appeal, framed it as an instance where council discretion can address a human circumstance even while acknowledging broader building-management issues.

Council then requested a board vote after debate; the motion to grant the appeal passed 75. The council also discussed use of chronic-nuisance abatement tools against property management and emphasized enforcement where necessary. No changes to the city's animal-limit ordinance were made at the meeting.

Don't Miss a Word: See the Full Meeting!

Go beyond summaries. Unlock every video, transcript, and key insight with a Founder Membership.

Get instant access to full meeting videos
Search and clip any phrase from complete transcripts
Receive AI-powered summaries & custom alerts
Enjoy lifetime, unrestricted access to government data
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee