A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Regents briefed on campus programs that teach constructive dialogue and reduce polarization

December 12, 2025 | University of Minnesota, Public Universities Board of Trustees Meeting, School Boards, Minnesota


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Regents briefed on campus programs that teach constructive dialogue and reduce polarization
The Mission Fulfillment Committee heard a multi‑campus presentation on efforts to prepare students for civic engagement and to reduce political polarization through structured dialogue and skill‑building.

Provost Ritter introduced a panel including Professor Emeritus Bill Doherty, who described nine years of volunteer work with Braver Angels and structured 'Red‑Blue' workshops that bring students of differing political views together to share life stories and build mutual understanding. ‘‘What he was really saying was he was gonna stop assuming malicious intent,’’ Doherty said, recounting a student takeaway from a workshop.

Mitra Imad, the Duluth campus lead for collaborative learning, described UMD’s work integrating constructive dialogue into residence life, first‑year courses (UST 1000), student leader training and campus debate events. She said the campus trained residence assistants in disagreeing better and embedded dialogue modules in first‑year programming so students learn listening, empathy and reflection.

Mercedes Ramirez Fernandez, vice president for equity and diversity, outlined the Bridging Beliefs project and an ongoing partnership with Interfaith America to cultivate pluralism and belonging. Ramirez Fernandez cited student reflections showing that structured dialogue helped participants feel heard and better able to engage across differences.

Regents questioned how deep such programs can go when confronting moralized issues and what metrics the board should use. The panel recommended starting with life‑stories and building measurable outcomes such as pre/post surveys of students’ sense of efficacy in discussing complex topics; Provost Ritter said such surveys and scaffolded skill development could be used to track progress.

The committee did not take action on these initiatives at the meeting; presenters said the programs are examples under the university’s Elevate Extraordinary 2030 plan and will be integrated into campus‑level implementation work.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee