A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Atherton planning commission recommends inclusionary-housing ordinance to council but excludes RM-10 sites from local fee

December 11, 2025 | Atherton Town, San Mateo County, California


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Atherton planning commission recommends inclusionary-housing ordinance to council but excludes RM-10 sites from local fee
The Atherton Planning Commission on Dec. 10 recommended that the City Council consider adopting a draft inclusionary housing ordinance, but the commission added a specific exception excluding RM-10 sites from the local inclusionary fee.

Town planner Britney Bendix summarized the draft ordinance and its rationale. The proposal would apply to RM-10, RM-20 and RM-40 overlay sites, require a minimum 20% of units as affordable for qualifying multifamily projects of five or more units, and set a 55-year affordability term for included units. The ordinance would also allow in-lieu fees, land dedication and other alternative compliance paths.

Bendix highlighted two state laws that shaped the discussion: SB 1123 (a 2025 law enabling certain lot splits in single-family zones, potentially creating up to 10 lots on qualifying vacant parcels) and SB 79 (which enables higher-density development near transit stations). She told commissioners the town needs local policy to capture inclusionary outcomes if these state pathways are used.

Commissioners debated whether a 20% requirement should apply to RM-10 sites and whether the ordinance should allow the state’s density-bonus/bonus-density concessions to effectively expand development beyond the town’s intent. One commissioner proposed excluding RM-10 sites from the local inclusionary fee to avoid incentivizing subdivisions or bonus-driven density on small parcels; that motion was moved, seconded and adopted by roll-call (four ayes, one abstention).

Commissioners asked staff to forward the draft ordinance and to relay the commission’s preferences and the RM-10 exclusion to the city council. Bendix said staff will present the package to council and prepare standards for SB 79 developments and other implementation details.

What happens next: The planning commission’s recommendation — including the RM-10 exception — will be transmitted to the City Council for its consideration and final action. Staff will develop implementation standards for SB 79 projects and return with additional materials.

Don't Miss a Word: See the Full Meeting!

Go beyond summaries. Unlock every video, transcript, and key insight with a Founder Membership.

Get instant access to full meeting videos
Search and clip any phrase from complete transcripts
Receive AI-powered summaries & custom alerts
Enjoy lifetime, unrestricted access to government data
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee