Strafford County opens construction bids; review and award tabled
December 05, 2025 | Strafford County, New Hampshire
This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »
STRAFFORD COUNTY, N.H. — County staff opened and read multiple construction bids at the public meeting; officials said they will review proposals and return with recommendations rather than award contracts immediately.
Speaker 1 read bids and related documentation for several firms. Perino Construction (Portsmouth) was listed with a base bid of $2,478,000 plus general conditions of $310,000 for a total proposed $2,788,000; the bid package listed optional add-ons, including removal of an existing bakery building. Transcript entries for Turnstone and other firms included figures rendered in the record in formats that were not always clear; reviewers agreed to examine each submission line-by-line for exclusions and allowances.
Other bids read aloud included Dotens Construction (listed as $3,450,000), River Valley Development Corporation (Newington) listed at $4,822,650, Hutter Construction (New Ipswich) with a figure read as $3,131,008.56, and a final entry rendered roughly as $3,462,000.86 for an entity referenced as Bauer/Emeritus. The transcript preserves the exact readings as presented during the opening and contains some duplicate pages and formatting artifacts noted by staff.
Speaker 1 disclosed a prior personal connection with the River Valley bidder: "I did declare 5 years ago, he built my house," and said he wanted to be upfront. No award was made at the meeting; a participant suggested items be "taken from the table" for subsequent consideration, and the commission then moved to adjourn.
The county did not provide an award decision or a detailed procurement timeline in the public transcript; staff instructed members to check each proposal and its attachments during the review process.
Speaker 1 read bids and related documentation for several firms. Perino Construction (Portsmouth) was listed with a base bid of $2,478,000 plus general conditions of $310,000 for a total proposed $2,788,000; the bid package listed optional add-ons, including removal of an existing bakery building. Transcript entries for Turnstone and other firms included figures rendered in the record in formats that were not always clear; reviewers agreed to examine each submission line-by-line for exclusions and allowances.
Other bids read aloud included Dotens Construction (listed as $3,450,000), River Valley Development Corporation (Newington) listed at $4,822,650, Hutter Construction (New Ipswich) with a figure read as $3,131,008.56, and a final entry rendered roughly as $3,462,000.86 for an entity referenced as Bauer/Emeritus. The transcript preserves the exact readings as presented during the opening and contains some duplicate pages and formatting artifacts noted by staff.
Speaker 1 disclosed a prior personal connection with the River Valley bidder: "I did declare 5 years ago, he built my house," and said he wanted to be upfront. No award was made at the meeting; a participant suggested items be "taken from the table" for subsequent consideration, and the commission then moved to adjourn.
The county did not provide an award decision or a detailed procurement timeline in the public transcript; staff instructed members to check each proposal and its attachments during the review process.
View the Full Meeting & All Its Details
This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.
✓
Watch full, unedited meeting videos
✓
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
✓
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
✓
Permanent access to expanding government content
30-day money-back guarantee
