The Vermont House on Wednesday night approved H.687, a sprawling bill to modernize Act 250 and advance housing and resilience measures, concurring in the Senate’s proposed amendments with further changes offered by the House and passing the motion on a roll-call vote of 99 to 32.
Member from Manchester, the bill’s House lead, told colleagues the package is intended to balance protections for natural resources with measures that make housing development more predictable and less costly. "Our goal has been to work with our colleagues across this body, and to stay in touch with the Senate with a goal of getting to yes on this complex bill," the member said, describing a series of targeted House modifications to the Senate amendment.
Why it matters: H.687 restructures key parts of Act 250 into a location-based framework, creates the Land Use Review Board (LERB), and establishes tiered exemptions intended to speed housing in designated downtowns, village centers and adjacent rings while adding rulemaking and reporting requirements intended to protect critical natural resources.
Major provisions and changes
- LERB and appointments: The bill renames the existing environmental review board the Land Use Review Board and changes board staffing to a full-time chair with full‑time members; the House amended the Senate’s schedule to accelerate appointments so the board can be operational earlier (moved in the amendment from July 31, 2025, to Jan. 1, 2025) and added a study due in January 2026 on whether appeals should be heard by the board or by courts.
- Interim exemptions and priority housing: The House preserved and refined interim exemptions that allow certain priority housing projects (in some cases up to 75 units on a tract entirely within a designated area) to be built without an Act 250 permit until Jan. 1, 2027, and added a new half‑mile ring around designated zones to receive similar exemptions so long as projects meet local zoning and sewer/water/soil requirements.
- Self-certification and permitting details: The Senate had required notarized self-certifications for permit compliance; the House removed the notarization requirement to avoid imposing an extra burden on permit holders while retaining regular self-certification obligations enforceable by district commissions.
- Protections and rulemaking for critical resources: The House added direction for rulemaking so that critical natural resource areas listed in section 27 are considered; if a resource is excluded from tier‑3 protection, the board must report the rationale for exclusion.
- Zoning, duplexes and lot standards: The House clarified that duplexes are to be treated like single‑family homes for purposes of setbacks and lot coverage and preserved language preventing municipalities from imposing more restrictive lot-size standards on multiunit dwellings.
- Flood and sale disclosures: The amendment restores and strengthens seller and landlord disclosure requirements for properties with flooding history or flood damage, and directs the department to provide a model notice form.
Funding and fiscal changes
- Property transfer tax and allocations: Ways & Means reported that the House’s property transfer tax construct would generate approximately $15,675,000 in additional revenue in the next fiscal year. Of that, the amendment directs roughly $6.1 million to the Vermont Housing & Conservation Trust Fund and about $1.28 million to the municipal and regional planning grant fund, with a set of targeted allocations totaling roughly $8.29 million for programs including a first-generation homebuyer grant, rental stabilization services, tenant representation pilots, rental arrears assistance and natural-resources staff support.
- Housing program inserts: The House incorporated elements from H.639 and H.829 including higher caps for accessibility improvements in the Vermont Home Improvement Program (VHIP), a resident services pilot, tenant representation funding, and a $2.5 million rental arrearage assistance appropriation to the Vermont State Housing Authority.
Floor debate and dissent
Lawmakers from rural districts warned that the bill, received as a large strike-all amendment late in the session, is too complex to digest quickly and that some changes may reduce the bill’s housing focus or impose burdens on small towns. "A bill of this magnitude is too much to absorb too late in this session," said the member from Berkshire (opposing vote). Other members argued the package represents a balanced approach to housing and conservation and that targeted revenue provisions benefit most home buyers while raising funds for housing programs.
Vote and next steps
The clerk recorded a roll-call vote: 99 yes, 32 no. Madam Speaker announced the House had concurred in the Senate’s proposal of amendment with the House’s further proposal of amendment. With concurrence complete, the bill will continue through the legislative process, including enactment steps and implementation via the board and rulemaking schedules included in the measure.
What’s next: The bill sets multiple reporting and rulemaking deadlines (including the LERB study on appeals), and includes dates for interim exemptions that expire Jan. 1, 2027. Implementation will require appointments, regional mapping by regional planning commissions, and subsequent rulemaking by the LERB and agencies named in the bill.