A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

House quickly concurs on pension and compensation changes for sheriffs and deputies in H.585

May 09, 2024 | HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, Committees, Legislative , Vermont


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

House quickly concurs on pension and compensation changes for sheriffs and deputies in H.585
The House of Representatives on the floor took up House Bill 585 by suspending its rules and concurred in a Senate proposal of amendment by voice vote. Speaker 3 explained the bill’s principal purpose was to implement a long-standing negotiation that permits certain sheriffs and deputy sheriffs who had elected into the State Employees Retirement System Group F to make a one-time election to move into Group G and to place future sheriffs and deputies into Group G.

Speaker 3, a representative, told the chamber: “This bill’s primary purpose is to effectuate a long standing negotiation that finally came through, with a revenue neutral way for sheriffs and sheriff’s deputies ... to elect to move to group g.” The floor explanation noted a clarification in the printed calendar that a sheriff or deputy must be a certified law-enforcement officer to make the one-time election from Group F to Group G.

The bill also adjusts statutory compensation language for elected sheriffs, introducing a tiered reduction tied to certification: a 10% reduction for level-2 certified sheriffs, an additional 10% reduction (20% total) for those with only level 1, and a 30% reduction for those without an active law-enforcement certification. The sponsor said the language is aligned with prior policy work on sheriff compensation and includes intent language and a reporting requirement related to compensation for state's attorneys without active bar admission.

The presiding officer put the question on concurrence; members responded by voice and the chair announced the ayes had it. The House’s concurrence in the Senate proposal of amendment was entered on the record, and the House moved on to the next item on the calendar.

The action was procedural and taken by voice vote; a roll-call tally was not specified on the floor record.

Don't Miss a Word: See the Full Meeting!

Go beyond summaries. Unlock every video, transcript, and key insight with a Founder Membership.

Get instant access to full meeting videos
Search and clip any phrase from complete transcripts
Receive AI-powered summaries & custom alerts
Enjoy lifetime, unrestricted access to government data
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee