The Vermont House passed House Bill 887 on third reading after extended floor debate over revenue choices and cost‑control measures for public education. The bill, a Ways and Means committee product intended to reduce an otherwise much larger rise in homestead property tax rates, combines immediate revenue changes with provisions to stabilize the education fund and a commission to recommend longer‑term reforms.
Representative Kornheiser (member from Brattleboro), speaking for the Committee on Ways and Means, said the bill responds to the December 1 projection from the Department of Taxes and the Joint Fiscal Office that prompted concern across school districts. Kornheiser said education spending pressures — including the end of federal ESSER pandemic funds, rising health‑care and transportation costs, and inflationary increases — would otherwise produce a much larger statewide tax increase. To blunt that effect the bill sets the homestead property tax yield at $9,846 and the dollar yield at $10,060, sets the non‑homestead rate at $0.442 per $100 of equalized education property value, increases the property tax credit by 14.97% as a one‑time measure, and uses two new revenue sources to add about $26.9 million to the education fund.
Those revenue sources are: (1) repeal of a sales‑tax exemption for certain prewritten ("cloud") software and (2) a 1.5% surcharge applied to the meals and rooms tax for short‑term rental purchases. The Ways and Means report and members on the floor framed those as less regressive alternatives to larger property‑tax increases; opponents argued they would still burden small businesses and modest short‑term hosts.
The bill also reinstates an excess‑spending threshold (set at 120%) with most historic carve‑outs removed except an exemption for bond payments, tightens common‑level‑of‑appraisal (CLA) adjustments, and includes technical and effective‑date clarifications. The committee added provisions to create a Commission on the Future of Public Education to study governance, funding formulas, tuition arrangements, consolidation and facility footprints, special education delivery, and other system design questions. The commission is directed to hold regional public hearings, with a first meeting to be called on or before July 15; a preliminary report by Dec. 15; and a final report with recommendations for statewide policy by Dec. 1, 2025.
Several floor amendments were offered. Representative Beck (member from St. Johnsbury) proposed a $5,000 appropriation and a treasurer study to analyze shifting Vermont State Teacher Retirement System normal costs from the statewide education fund to district budgets; committees reported that amendment unfavorable and it failed on the floor. Representative Shaw (member from Pittsburgh) moved to strike the short‑term rental surcharge; that amendment went to a roll‑call and was defeated, 39 yeas to 104 nays. Other amendments (including sunsets on the new taxes and revisions to allowable growth and designation rules) were debated and many were rejected or withdrawn after committee review.
Floor votes: committee voice votes adopted Appropriations’ clarifications earlier in the day; the roll‑call on the short‑term rental amendment recorded 39 yes and 104 no, and the third reading roll‑call to pass H.887 recorded 94 yes and 38 no. The House ordered third reading and passed the bill.
Quotes from the floor captured the competing framings: opponents warned that new taxes and thresholds could disproportionately affect small businesses and underfunded districts; supporters said the package provides immediate taxpayer relief this year while launching a deliberate commission to produce sustainable, data‑driven reform.
What happens next: with third reading ordered and passage in the House, H.887 will proceed to the Senate for its consideration and any further amendments. The bill contains multiple effective dates and technical sections that Appropriations and floor amendments will continue to refine as it proceeds through the legislative process.