During the public-comment portion, a resident identified as Bill urged the commission to consider using existing city-owned property as a temporary campsite before purchasing private land. He argued the city already owns sites with utilities and fencing and that giving such a location an address would make it easier for police and service providers to respond.
"They already have property. It's paved. It's lit. It's fenced. It has power. It has water. It has sewage," Bill said, naming Roseburg Lumbers and an old truck shop as examples he believes could be used in the short term.
Commissioners listened but did not take action on the specific site recommendation during the meeting. The meeting discussion later returned to broader questions about site selection process, who should make final site decisions and the constraints on discussing properties in public meetings.
No formal referral or vote on Bill's proposal was recorded in the transcript; commissioners instead discussed using work groups to develop criteria and recommended referring final property decisions to city council when appropriate.