District leadership told the board they are moving forward with a bond-analysis process led by Stifel to determine how much the district could seek for capital projects. The superintendent said the district intends to identify priority projects, with a new high-school gymnasium listed as the primary need, and will convene a community steering committee to guide public outreach if the board agrees to pursue a resolution in May or June.
Board members sought more detail before endorsing a bond timeline. "At a time when we've got high inflation, bond rates are high, we're asking something where basically you're gonna be increasing the taxes on the people in the city," one member said, asking for clear cost estimates and project scopes before asking voters to approve a tax increase. Administrators responded that the bond analysis will produce capacity numbers and that architects would later define project specifics and priorities for any ballot question.
Administrators said possible projects beyond a gymnasium include tennis-court lighting, track repairs, seating/bleacher replacement and upgrades that would accompany a new building (HVAC, etc.). They noted some fields are leased from the city and that any capital proposal would clarify ownership and maintenance responsibilities.
Why it matters: a bond affects local taxpayers and defines capital priorities for the district for decades; board members emphasized the need for transparency about costs and tax impacts and for robust community engagement before any election.
Next steps: the district will receive the bond-analysis breakdown, assemble a community committee for outreach, and return to the board with specific figures and a proposed resolution for consideration prior to any election.