District staff presented a plan to install vape‑detection sensors across the high school (all student bathrooms) and to pilot two active sensors plus dummy units at each middle school. Administration cited a current project scope of roughly 66–67 sensors and an approximate total one‑time cost in the neighborhood of $66,000 for the devices, installation and initial licensing as presented. The project includes a cloud‑management licensing fee (annual) and installation labor (running Ethernet and training response staff), which staff said are major cost drivers.
Board members asked several clarifying questions: how many bathrooms exist at each building, the difference between one‑time device costs and recurring cloud‑license fees, whether the district could install devices in‑house to reduce labor costs, and whether vendor dummy sensors could be used to create uncertainty about which bathrooms are monitored. Members also requested data showing middle‑school incidence rates before approving a middle‑school pilot; administrators said disciplinary records show substantially more vaping incidents at the high school than at middle schools but acknowledged the middle‑school data are limited.
Several members raised operational concerns including: how staff will respond when a sensor 'pings' (notification routing and discipline protocol), vandalism risk and protective covers for sensors, and possible sewer impacts from students flushing vape pens. Facilities staff said they had received a letter from the township sewer authority about the need to address vape‑pen flushing because it can damage sewer monitoring equipment and create fines; administration said they would investigate and factor that into planning.
No final procurement vote occurred during the meeting; the board asked staff to return with a cost breakdown (one‑time vs. recurring), data on middle‑school incidents and number of bathrooms per building, a description of response protocols when sensors alert, and a proposal for limiting ongoing licensing costs.