Board reviews MIBs, EDR and multiple construction bids; debate grows over use of change orders

Mister Rucker (IT staff) told the board that “MIDS is a managed internal broadband service, which is an E Rate knowledgeable service,” explaining the product will install monitoring software on switches and servers, patch systems and help the district better track network health. He said E‑Rate Category 2 typically covers about 85 percent of such projects and the district would budget the remaining 15 percent. Rucker estimated an implementation timeline of six to nine weeks and said installation work would be scheduled after hours.

Rucker and other staff distinguished MIBs from other cybersecurity appliances: "A firewall more or less protects the easiest way I can describe it is it protects traffic from outside. And this kinda ties into the EDR," he said, while describing SentinelOne as a proposed endpoint detection and response solution to protect devices from internal threats like malicious USB devices or ransomware.

Operations staff reported two qualified vendors for a PA/intercom solution (referred to in the packet as InformaCast); a district-wide test was pending resolution of an API integration issue with the student information system. Staff asked the board to consider running data jacks and conduit now while walls are open in renovation projects to avoid later disruption and higher costs; consultants said backbone data wiring would remain interoperable if a different PA vendor is selected later.

On construction, Ethan (Dewey engineering) announced apparent low bids for the West High Tech Ed renovation with a total around $950,689 and described multiple change orders under consideration: rubberized flooring in a weight room (West Intermediate), additional data jacks to support future PA equipment, and corridor wall coverings at Robert Morris (proposed porcelain tile change order ~ $83,746). Several board members voiced concern about frequent change orders and whether the district was getting the best price by adding scope to existing contracts instead of publicly bidding separate work; staff and consultants said that public bidding is an option but can add time and costs, and agreed to provide documentation and a reconciliation of change orders and permit-fee practices to the operations committee.

No final awards were confirmed at the meeting; staff indicated they will confirm PDE approvals where necessary and return with bid specifications, cost reconciliation and recommendations at subsequent meetings.