A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Libraries Press for State Guardrails on Ebook Licensing as Costs and Expirations Bite

February 19, 2023 | 2025 Legislature CT, Connecticut


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Libraries Press for State Guardrails on Ebook Licensing as Costs and Expirations Bite
Librarians, consortia and the state librarian told the Planning and Development Committee that current ebook licensing terms are unsustainable for public libraries across Connecticut.

Deborah Shander, State Librarian, said the State Library has spent almost $100,000 this fiscal year on ebooks and projected nearly $200,000 by year end, while losing access to more than 1,000 titles (about 14% of its collection) when licenses expired. "I'm not here today asking to spend less. I'm asking to spend better to be able to purchase more titles and support more readers using the funds that we are already spending," Shander said.

Rebecca Harlow, chair of the ebook committee for the LION consortium, presented data showing the consortium has spent more than $2.2 million on leased digital material and will lose more than $1 million in content value as licenses expire over two years. Local directors and coalition leaders said pricing commonly runs three to six times consumer ebook prices and that short‑term, metered licenses (for example, two‑year expirations or lending limits) prevent libraries from building lasting collections and meeting high demand for popular titles.

Library advocates told the committee HB6958 is narrowly tailored to contract and consumer protection law to avoid federal copyright preemption. They said the bill would not compel publishers to sell; rather it would create acceptable contractual terms if a publisher chooses to offer a license. Librarians emphasized equity concerns: many residents depend on library digital access for audiobooks, large‑font ebooks and 24/7 access when branches are closed.

Committee members asked how other states fared and whether litigation risk exists; witnesses described prior legal challenges in other states but said the Connecticut draft focuses on contract principles, not compulsory licensing. The committee requested follow‑up material and technical language to minimize legal risk and to preserve access to authors and publishers.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee